FRAX series sweep frequency response analysers
High dynamic range and accuracy
Allows even the most subtle electromechanical changes within the transformer to be detected
Easy-to-use support software with advanced analysis tools
Easily select and deselect multiple sweeps and sets of sweeps to compare phase-to-phase or previous to current measurements. Advanced analysis and custom formulas allow for sound decision making with regard to further diagnostic analysis and transformer disposition
Smallest SFRA instrument in the industry
FRAX instruments weigh from just 1.8 kg with batteries, with dimensions 25 cm x 17 cm x 5 cm, depending on the model. Easy to transport in a convenient case that houses cables and the test instrument
Hardware designed to ensure repeatable connections
Colour-coordinated connection points and wide C-clamp connectors with adjustable braided grounds ensure consistent connections no matter who uses the equipment, virtually eliminating changes in curves due to connection issues
Fulfils international standards for SFRA
Sweep frequency response analysis (SFRA) measurements for IEC 60076-18, IEEE C57.149, and more
About the product
The FRAX99, FRAX101, and FRAX150 sweep frequency response analysers (SFRA) are the smallest and most rugged instruments of their type and powerful tools for revealing potential electrical and mechanical problems in power transformers, many of which are difficult or impossible to detect using other methods.
Meeting all international standards for SFRA measurements, these innovative instruments offer a larger dynamic range and better accuracy than any other comparable test sets currently available. In addition, for the test connections to the transformer, they use a special cabling technology that ensures the repeatability of results.
The FRAX series operates by applying a sweep frequency test signal to the transformer and monitoring its response. The result is a unique fingerprint that reveals a wide range of faults when compared with a reference fingerprint for the same transformer. These include winding deformations and displacements, shorted and open windings, loose and broken clamping structures, core connection problems, core movement, and hoop buckling.
Megger’s FRAX series incorporates powerful analysis and support software. In addition to offering the traditional magnitude versus frequency/phase display, this software allows you to present data in an impedance or admittance versus frequency view, a powerful analytical tool for many transformer types.
The test frequency range covered by the FRAX is 0.1 Hz to 25 MHz, and you can set the range employed for individual tests to match the application’s needs. By default, the number of test points used for each frequency sweep is 1046, but you can extend this up to a maximum of 32 000. The typical measurement time is 64 seconds, but a fast mode is available that can deliver results in just 37 seconds.
Small and easy to carry, with an operating temperature range of -20 ºC to +50 ºC, the FRAX sweep frequency response analysers are ideal for use in the field. They are supplied with ground cable, four 3 m braid sets, two C clamps, 9 m or 18 m connection cables, a user guide, and Windows software.
There are three models in the FRAX series:
- FRAX099: optional battery, connects to an external laptop for control and data analysis with standard USB cable
- FRAX101: optional battery, supports both Bluetooth and standard USB connection for control by and exchanging data with an external laptop, includes built-in ground loop detector
- FRAX150: mains-operated with an integrated PC that has a high-resolution colour screen featuring a powerful backlight that makes it easy to read even in direct sunlight and includes a built-in ground loop detector
FAQ / Frequently Asked Questions
You can connect your SFRA test instrument to an optional accessory called the FRAX demo box FDB 101 (part number AC-90050), which allows you to short turns, shift the transformer core, and make other changes to show how different faults affect SFRA traces. This training tool will enable you to familiarise, or re-familiarise, yourself with the FRAX and software before testing in the field.
SFRA testing, which you can conveniently perform with a Megger FRAX test set, is used to check the mechanical integrity of transformer components such as the core, the windings, and the clamping structures. The test entails injecting a low voltage signal into one end of a winding and measuring the voltage output at the other end so that the electrical transfer function of the transformer can be determined. The test is typically repeated over a frequency range from 20 Hz to 2 MHz. The results are compared with a reference curve produced using the same technique when the transformer was new or known to be undamaged. This technique reveals many fault types, including core movements, faulty core grounds, winding deformations, winding displacements, partial winding collapse, hoop buckling, and shorted turns. It’s important to note that SFRA is essentially a comparative test. Without a reference curve for the transformer, the information provided by the test is much more challenging to interpret.
Repeatability is at the forefront of the FRAX design, both in the internal electronics and the leads and connections to the transformer. The FRAX 99 has an internal noise level of less than -120 dB, while the FRAX 101 and 150 are even lower at less than -140 dB. Repeatability is also built into the leads by following best practices of the shortest braided ground principle and secure connections with C-clamps. The FRAX 101 and 150 also have an embedded ‘Ground Loop Detector’ to verify proper connections before running the test.
Yes. Although a time-based comparison is the best method for evaluating SFRA measurements, you can still compare measurements between sister transformers or make a phase-to-phase comparison for an initial evaluation. Additionally, testing the transformer in a known good condition will allow you to evaluate the transformer later if there is a fault or catastrophic event.
Both the FRAX 101 and FRAX 99 are available with a battery option. The battery will last up to 8 hours of continuous use and 12 hours of standby. With a fully charged battery and laptop, you can test multiple transformers in one day without power at the site. This powering flexibility is especially advantageous when transporting transformers where you may be measuring at transfer points. The battery takes four hours to charge fully, and the FRAX can also run off AC power while its battery is charging.
Yes – and no! SFRA (sweep frequency response analysis) testing is the best-known variable frequency transformer testing technique. Still, it’s not the only one. Several other transformer diagnostic techniques are based on frequency, each of which has unique diagnostic functions and values. Other widely used techniques include DFR (dielectric frequency response), narrowband DFR, and FRSL (frequency response of stray losses).
FRSL stands for frequency response of stray losses. It’s a technique for assessing the condition of transformer windings by performing short-circuit tests over a wide range of frequencies. Diagnostics based on FRSL rely on comparing results to earlier measurements, tests carried out on an identical transformer, or between phases. Measurements are made on the high voltage side of the transformer, with the low voltage side short-circuited. FRSL testing uniquely reveals strand-to-strand short circuits in a winding. You can perform FRSL tests with Megger FRAX and TRAX test sets
The IEEE guide for SFRA is IEEE C57.149 Guide for the Application and Interpretation of Frequency Response Analysis for Oil-Immersed Transformers. Other relevant SFRA documents include IEC 60076-18 Ed. 1 – 2012, Std. DL/T911-2004, and Cigré Technical Brochure No. 342, April 2008.
Yes. IEEE C57.152 Guide for Diagnostic Field Testing of Fluid-Filled Power Transformers, Regulators, and Reactors recommends SFRA as a diagnostic test. SFRA can often pick up mechanical issues that other electrical tests might miss
The individual sweeps take a little over 40 seconds to complete; the longest part of the test is making connections. Once the transformer is fully isolated, you can complete an SFRA test on a two-winding transformer in about 45 minutes, as long as you can reach the bushing terminals while standing on top of the transformer. For higher voltage transformers requiring a manlift to access the bushing terminals, you will need additional time (approximately double) to make the connections.
Yes. The FRAX software can import and export data in multiple formats to compare to other measurement data from different instruments.
The FRAX is available with either 9 m (30 ft) or 18 m (60 ft) cable lengths. The 9 m will cover most transformers 245 kV and below, whereas you will need the 18 m cables for higher voltages. The FRAX 101 can be placed on top of the transformer and connected via Bluetooth to help reduce the cable length needed.
Further reading and webinars
Related products
Troubleshooting
Unplug the USB cable from the FRAX and your PC, check for any foreign objects in the cables or connection ports, and then plug them back in. Start up the FRAX software. Connect to the instrument by selecting “Connect” under the “File” menu, clicking the “Connect” button on the right side of the window, or using the F7 key. If connections are set up correctly, the window name will change from “FRAX (Disconnected)” to “FRAX (Connected).” If the connection doesn’t work, you will get an error message suggesting what to do. Selecting the recommended port number with a green symbol next to it will typically rectify connection issues.
The FRAX 101 has a built-in Class 1 Bluetooth antenna and comes with a Class 1 USB Bluetooth adapter for your computer. We recommend always using this adapter because most PCs only come with Class 2 Bluetooth, which is limited in range and unsuitable for substation environments. To install the Bluetooth adapter, install the software that comes with it before inserting it into your PC. If you insert the adapter before installing the software, you may need to uninstall and reinstall the Bluetooth software and/or driver. When connecting to the FRAX for the first time, you will need to power on the FRAX 101 and add a new Bluetooth device under the windows menu. It should appear as Megger FRAX 101, and the pairing code is “0000.” After pairing is complete, you can connect to the FRAX 101 in the FRAX software.
We recommend using the Bluetooth adapter that comes with the FRAX 101 because the built-in Bluetooth in a PC is limited in range and unsuitable for substation environments. In noisy substations, it is also beneficial to establish a connection to the FRAX when the instrument is close to your PC. Then you can move it to the top of the transformer or farther away as needed. It is easier to maintain a connection once established than connecting for the first time at longer distances. Additionally, if the USB Bluetooth antenna is inserted into a different USB port on your PC, this may switch the COM port that the Bluetooth uses to connect. Verify the COM port before connecting.
A low output voltage usually occurs when there is a short between the signal generator clamp and the measurement clamp. Check all connections and connection points to ensure no unwanted grounds or shorts are present.
You should check test leads for continuity and integrity before use. The best means for checking lead integrity and correct equipment operation is to perform the FRA self-check using a standard test object. This check is particularly beneficial for checking FRA test equipment since there is generally no intuitive way of knowing if the test equipment is giving correct results when making field measurements. The FTB 101 included with the FRAX test set is provided for field verification. In addition to the self-check using the FTB 101, you can perform a short circuit self-test (large C-clamps connected to each other and small ground clamps connected to each other) and an open circuit self-test (clamps isolated and not connected to anything) to help identify any issues. The graph below shows a typical response for short circuit, FTB 101, and open circuit self-tests.
Note: when performing a short circuit self-test, the FRAX software will open a pop-up window that states low output voltage. Just click “OK” and proceed with the test.
Interpreting test results
Understanding how each SFRA response should look before performing these measurements is useful. This way, it is possible to recognise when a measured response differs from what it should be. In these cases, there is a possibility that the cause is a test preparation mistake, e.g., poor grounding or improper test connections. If recognised while still in the field, you can repeat the test after double-checking the test connections/preparation. You should perform a quick test set verification if there is any question on the validity of the measurements (see the instrument verification test in the troubleshooting section). You should also perform a ground loop test with the FRAX by pressing the “GLD” button on the FRAX instrument before beginning each test on the transformer to verify that you have made good ground connections.
SFRA output signal settings typically range from 20 Hz to 2 MHz, inclusive, to inspect the integrity of the complete transformer. You may perform four main types of SFRA tests:
- Open Circuit Self Admittance: the signal is applied on one end of a winding, and the response is measured on its other end. All other connections are left floating (if there is a DELTA stabilising winding, these should remain shorted but not grounded). Six tests are performed on a two-winding transformer, three on the high side and three on the low side. The open circuit test looks at both the winding and core characteristics of the transformer as well as taps and connections.
- Short Circuit Self Admittance: the signal is applied on one end of a winding, and the response is measured on its other end. Three tests are performed, one on each high-side winding, while the three low-side windings are shorted together. This test focuses on the windings. By short-circuiting the low-side windings, you are shorting out the core effects on the test. Evaluating the short circuit tests and the open circuit tests allows you to determine if the change in the curve is due to faults in the core or the windings.
- Capacitive Inter-winding: the signal is applied to one terminal on the high-side winding, and the response is measured on the corresponding terminal of the low-side winding. Three of these tests are performed, one for each phase/winding. This test focuses on the capacitance between the windings and helps detect radial deformations.
- Inductive Inter-winding: this is similar to the capacitive inter-winding with the exception that the opposite ends of each winding that the signal is applied to, and measured on, are grounded. This test focuses on the inductance of both windings.
Since the transformer can be modelled as a complex RLC circuit, every transfer will have a unique response. Still, there will be some commonalities based on transformer design. There is no set frequency range that corresponds to the components of the transformer, but there are some general ranges. The following frequency response ranges for an open circuit test on a transformer are the most common:
- The response in the lowest frequencies, approximately 20 Hz to 10 kHz, is dominated by the transformer's core. However, the windings will have some influence on this section of the response.
- As you move into the midrange frequencies of 2 kHz to 500 kHz, the windings will influence the response most.
- At the highest frequencies starting from a few hundred thousand Hz up to 1 to 10 MHz and beyond, the taps and connections of the transformer will make up most of the response. However, as the frequency sweeps past 1 MHz for transformers greater than 72.5 kV and 2 MHz for transformers 72.5 kV and below, the setup and connections of the instrument will have the most significant influence on the response. These are general guidelines, and the influence of the components can and will vary outside of these frequencies.
SFRA test results are evaluated using comparative analysis. Reference SFRA test results may be in the form of any or all of the following (listed in order of most valuable).
This is the most reliable approach to interpreting SFRA test results. Deviations between SFRA curves are easy to detect and often indicate a problem. For this reason, it is desirable to obtain benchmark SFRA test results on a transformer when it is in known good condition, such as during its commissioning, to have a reliable future reference with which to compare. The test conditions, e.g., the position of the tap changer(s), the type of SFRA test, and any special preparation, should be the same for the reference and repeated measurements for correct interpretation.
Care is required with this approach, as minor deviations between traces do not necessarily indicate a problem. This approach also requires knowledge about the transformer under test.
When evaluating or comparing the results of transformers based on the same design, you want to make sure they are as similar as possible. Comparing transformers with the exact specifications but manufactured by different companies or even by the same company in different years can reveal significantly different traces. Note, too, that just because the same manufacturer builds two transformers with the same ratings that are even just one serial number apart (e.g., single-phase generator transformers or multiple three-phase transformers delivered in the same order) does not guarantee the construction of the units is the same. That being said, the latter is the ideal transformer group for comparative purposes when using this approach.
If the traces are very similar, you can be reasonably confident that the transformers are in good condition. If the traces vary a little, then the differences in readings may reflect a dissimilarity in construction versus an actual issue with the transformer(s).
This approach is the most challenging, as minor deviations between traces may be completely normal. For example, comparing the SFRA responses of a three-phase transformer's two outer phases. The middle (centre) phase response typically differs from the outer phase responses, particularly in the core region of the open circuit test responses. As the sweep moves up in frequency and the winding starts to dominate the response, each phase's trace will mimic each other and, in some cases, look identical. With this being said, there may not be symmetry between the outer-wound phases.
Despite its challenges, the phase comparison approach is an exceptionally insightful diagnostic for short-circuit SFRA tests. For these tests, all three short-circuit responses should be nearly identical. A magnified view of the linear part of the inductive roll-off should reveal no more than a 0.1 dB difference between the three traces, and the roll-off should be close to -20 dB/ decade. Poor connections (i.e., increased resistance) will affect the short-circuit SFRA responses at the lowest frequencies (e.g., 20 Hz). Short of that, you may need to check the transformer with DC winding resistance tests in these cases.
The figure below shows a typical response of a high voltage (HV) open circuit, a low voltage (LV) open circuit, and a HV short circuit test, respectively, on a two-winding DELTA-WYE transformer:
When comparing new traces to a reference trace, any of the following can indicate a potential mechanical change:
- Resonance (i.e., peaks and valleys) shifts
- Additional resonance
- Loss of resonance
- Overall magnitude difference
For a more detailed explanation of SFRA and results interpretation along with examples, contact us for a complementary copy of our comprehensive SFRA Transformer Life Management Bulletin.
User guides and documents
Software and firmware updates
FAQ / Frequently Asked Questions
SFRA and DFR are entirely different tests. SFRA looks at any kind of mechanical changes inside the transformer, whereas DFR is used to determine the moisture present in the cellulose (solid insulation) of oil-filled power transformers. The two tests have very different applications.
You derive the most significant diagnostic detail in an SFRA analysis by comparing current tests to previous tests or a transformer’s initial ‘fingerprint.’ Therefore, we recommend performing SFRA on new transformers when commissioning, or if the unit is already in service, ASAP, when the transformer is in known good condition. SFRA has also become very popular when transporting a transformer to its site. A ‘sweep’ can be made at the factory before the transformer’s shipment and once again at the site when received to check that no damage occurred during transportation. For the validity of a direct comparison between results, you must emulate all aspects of the original test, including testing with the test or transportation bushings installed and with the transformer filled with oil (or not).
Yes, each test will provide different information about your transformer. Power factor and DFR tests look at the insulation of the transformer. Turns ratio and winding resistance tests reveal the condition of the windings. SFRA provides notable information about the mechanical integrity of the transformer and can help you determine if a transformer has sustained any mechanical damage. Each electrical test you perform gives you a bit more insight, and together they form a good picture of your transformer’s health. Sometimes a ‘second opinion’ from two or more tests on the same component can help you confirm a suspected problem.
For SFRA:
No particular order must be followed for open circuit and short circuit SFRA tests. However, to increase efficiency, you may want to run the tests in an order that will help you minimise lead changes, e.g., after running an HV open test of H1-H3, you can quickly short the low side windings and run the HV shorted test on H1-H3. From here, the leads can be switched to H2-H1 to perform the HV shorted test, then remove the shorts to perform the HV open test on H2-H1, finishing by measuring the H3-H2 open and shorted tests. This test order may save time rather than switching the HV connections between all six tests, particularly in the case of higher voltage transformers where you cannot easily reach the terminals. It is much easier to apply and remove shorts on the transformer’s low side than change the high side connections multiple times.
For complete electrical tests:
Excitation current and SFRA tests should be completed first and winding resistance tests last. This recommendation is to prevent residual magnetism from the winding resistance test from affecting the results of the other tests. However, you do not have to worry about the test sequence if your winding resistance test set can demagnetise the transformer efficiently after the test. One can argue that there is a benefit in bringing a transformer’s core to a consistent state of magnetisation (via an effective demag feature of a test instrument) at the start of an ensuing test sequence that includes excitation current and SFRA tests.
Yes, SFRA is a very sensitive test that can pick up small physical or mechanical changes inside the transformer. Therefore, having any extra connections to the transformer, e.g., the bus, can significantly change the response (particularly in the higher frequencies). Fully isolating the transformer will help secure the most repeatable results and the best analysis.
In an ideal world, when commissioning the transformer, you would test at all taps, i.e., each position of the DETC with the OLTC set to its nominal position and all tap positions of the OLTC with the DETC set to its in-service position. With each tap position requiring 15 sweeps for a two-winding transformer, this quickly becomes impractical with time and resource constraints. The general recommendation is to place the DETC in its in-service position and perform the standard 15 sweeps with the OLTC in the fully raised position; this assures that all winding turns on the OLTC will be in the measurement. Additionally, the sweeps are often repeated with the OLTC in the nominal position. When placing the OLTC in the nominal position, you should approach from the ‘raised one’ tap. By making SFRA measurements in both the fully raised and nominal OLTC positions, you will have a general picture of the transformer with the OLTC fully engaged and not engaged.
Note: when performing SFRA measurements, always note the tap positions at which the test was made for future reference and analysis.
Proper connections and grounding are paramount to a successful SFRA test. Ensure sufficient clamp pressure connecting to the transformer terminals and use the shortest braided ground principles. If there is any paint or corrosion at the connection points, clean it off or verify that the clamps have penetrated through it. Additionally, you can perform a ground loop check to ensure that the grounding lead connections and the transformer ground are at a common point. You can perform a ground loop check by pressing the “GLD” button on the FRAX 101 and 150 instruments or manually check with an ohmmeter if your SFRA unit does not have this feature. Poor grounding and connection issues will typically manifest in the highest frequencies (approximately 500 kHz and above). It is advisable to check connections and perform the sweep again if the sweeps vary significantly in this frequency range compared to previous measurements.
Yes. Open circuit test sweeps will change in the lower frequencies if the core is magnetised. The sweep generally will shift up and to the right. The effects of magnetisation on SFRA results are why it is important to perform SFRA tests before a DC winding resistance test if planned. If this is not possible, you should demagnetise the transformer before performing an SFRA test.
Proper test preparation and setup are essential with any electrical test. SFRA tests, in particular, are acutely sensitive to small mechanical changes within the transformer, meaning that any change in the setup can affect the response. Therefore, you should pay meticulous attention to your connections, test practices, and preparations to ensure repeatable results. Always make solid connections in the same location, follow the shortest braided ground principle, and ensure the transformer is in the same conditions when tested, including tap changer positions, bushings, and oil level. You should note anything that has changed on the transformer since the previous test. Always note the tap positions of the transformer when performing the test and, if applicable, the position from which the tap was transitioned into.
Yes, after a transformer is rebuilt, it is essentially a new transformer, so its previous measurements will differ from its current measurements. At this point, the transformer needs to be re-commissioned, and a new SFRA fingerprint needs to be taken.
Yes. SFRA test results, when performed correctly and under similar conditions (correct grounding, same tap position, and similar connections), are comparable. Factors that can affect test results include residual magnetism and poor grounding practices. Megger’s FRAX software can uniquely import previous results from any other manufacturer’s test set and compare results. The FRAX 101 and FRAX 150 also can adjust the output voltage to match legacy products from other manufacturers that didn’t use a 10 V p-p input signal.
When you select “File” under the main FRAX software menu, there is an “Import” and an “Export” option. Several alternative formats are available for selection (CIGRE, csv, txt, Doble).
Open circuit SFRA sweeps are voltage-dependent in the lower frequencies due to the magnetising impedance of the transformer. Therefore, the sweep will vary as the voltage changes. Once the sweep moves into the mid-range frequencies, where the windings fully influence the sweep, the curves will line up independent of voltage. In those cases where you desire to compare results to older sweeps at different voltages, we recommend running the test at the previous voltage and then performing the test again with the default 10 V peak voltage that the FRAX uses.
On the FRAX101 and 150, the output voltage level may be adjusted from the standard/default of 10 V up to 12 V and down to 0.1 V by changing a command line in a file in the FRAX directory. The file name is “connectioncommands.txt,” and its default location is C:\Program Files\Megger\FRAX. To adjust the output voltage, open the file in Notepad and add the command “gen:gainx=k” to the file. K is a factor for setting the voltage and is defaulted to k = 1 for 10 Vpeak. For example, to set the output voltage to 2.828 Vpeak (2 V RMS), change the value to k = 0.2828. The value must be between 1.2 and 0.01. Save the changes and exit. You must disconnect and reconnect to the FRAX to activate the new setting.
An SFRA open circuit test will show the response of the core and windings, while an SFRA short circuit test only shows the response of the windings. Each frequency range corresponds to different components in the transformer and is where a problem with those respective components would manifest in the SFRA trace. Some general frequency ranges are shown below.
- 20 Hz to 2 kHz: Main core deformation, open circuits, shorted turns, residual magnetism
- 10 kHz to 20 kHz: Bulk winding component, shunt impedance
- 20 kHz to 400 kHz: Deformation within the main windings
- 400 kHz to 1 MHz: Tap winding
Note: each transformer will have specific responses and the ranges above are for general reference only. For windings rated less than 72 kV, IEC recommends running the test up to 2 MHz.
IEEE C57.149 states that a “Large temperature difference, typically much more than 10 ºC, between two measurements will slightly influence the response at higher frequencies”.
For practical purposes, the effect of temperature on SFRA measurements is very small and can be ignored as long as there is not a considerable temperature variation between the two comparison traces.
You would have to run a total of 30 different tests.
- 12 open circuit tests, one on each winding (4 windings x 3 phases =12 tests)
- 18 short circuit tests:
- 9 tests (From the high side with three secondaries shorted one at a time)
- 6 tests (From the X side with other two secondaries shorted one at a time)
- 3 tests (From the Y side with the last secondary shorted)
In such cases, IEEE C57.152 recommends performing all electrical tests, including power factor and SFRA. A power factor test may reveal a change in insulation condition and capacitance, while an SFRA trace will help diagnose any issues or failures associated with transformer windings.
There is no industry guideline for using SFRA based on a transformer’s VA ratings. In theory, you can perform SFRA on any size transformer (or windings, such as motors). If subsequent tests are performed under similar conditions, the results can be compared and analysed. Other electrical tests like transformer turns ratio (TTR), excitation current, and DC insulation tests will also give valuable information on smaller transformers.
Yes. SFRA looks at the response of the complex RLC network inside a transformer. You can perform baseline or reference measurements on dry-type transformers and compare results over the years. For dry-type transformers, you need to be aware of the effect that ground capacitances can have on the traces. Additionally, the response on the low side may have slight deviations because of low signal levels. A very good ground plane will produce more repeatable measurements.
Traditional open and short circuit tests are typically performed in factories to determine the transformer’s no load and copper losses. The manufacturer commonly uses sources equal to the transformer’s ‘rated value’ when performing these tests. By determining the no load and copper losses, you can resolve the different components in an equivalent circuit of a transformer.
Although they share similar names and connections, SFRA open circuit and short circuit tests are entirely different. The SFRA open circuit test looks at the electrical response of the core and winding, and the SFRA short circuit test isolates the transformer’s winding response. These tests are operated at a low voltage of 10 V p-p but help you narrow down the areas where a problem might be.
Per IEEE C57.149, testing with oil is the most common and preferred method for frequency response analysis. Safety should be considered when testing a transformer without oil so that excessive voltages are not applied. The presence of oil changes the frequency response. Results with and without oil will cause variations in the SFRA traces. Below is an excerpt from the IEEE guidelines:
“For new equipment, this may require the performance of two FRA tests after receipt of the equipment at the final destination; 1) one test with the transformer in its shipping configuration, 2) and one test with the transformer assembled and oil-filled as required for insulation resistance testing, to be used as baseline data for future testing. If no shipping damage is suspected, the test in the as-shipped configuration may not be necessary as a receipt test”.
Often, the manufacturer fills and drains the transformer before shipment. You should know the conditions under which the manufacturer performed an SFRA test before shipment from the factory. IEEE further states that:
“If the equipment is to arrive drained of oil, the shipping configuration should specify that it will be tested pre and post movement without oil. If the equipment is to be shipped after being drained of oil, it should be tested pre-movement without oil. Testing the unit prior to shipment in this case without oil and prior to a first fill, may not be adequate and could lead to false failures due to residual oil being held in the windings, or additional oil draining from the winding during weeks of shipment. If the equipment is to be shipped with oil, it should be fully filled for both pre and post movement tests. If the equipment is to be shipped partially filled, it should be tested with the same level of oil, or preferentially after oil has been added. Ensuring oil is at the same level before and after transportation for partially filled transformers can be difficult and sometimes leads to incorrect assessments.”